Replies to LegCo questions
LCQ9: Anti-rodent measures
Following is a question by the Hon Mrs Sophie Leung and a written reply by the
Secretary for Health, Welfare and Food, Dr York Chow, in the Legislative Council
today (February 23):
Question :
Recently, several members of the public have told me that large rodents had been
spotted on the busy streets and near the sewers in Central. However, the rodent
infestation rates had decreased gradually from 16 per cent in 2000 to 4.3 per
cent between January and June in 2004, while the numbers of captured and
poisoned rodents had decreased gradually from 57, 639 in 2000 to 40, 342 in
2003. In this connection, will the Government inform this Council:
(a) whether it has assessed if the above statistics accurately reveal the real
situation and severity of rodent infestation in the territory; if the assessment
result is in the affirmative, of the relevant figures by districts; if the
result is in the negative; of the mitigation measures;
(b) whether it has evaluated the economic losses caused by rodent infestation
every year;
(c) how it decides the scope of anti-rodent works, including whether it has
regularly assessed the number of rodents in the territory and the anticipated
number of rodents bred; and whether it has made reference to the anti-rodent
measures taken in other places; if it has not, of the reasons for that; and
(d) how it evaluates the effectiveness of anti-rodent works, as well as the
evaluation results, and whether it will step up anti-rodent efforts?
Reply :
Madam President,
(a) Based on the percentage of bait consumed by rodents, the rodent infestation
rate is a scientific and objective approach to determine the degree of rodent
infestation in the area of interest. It helps to identify rodent infestation
black spots for swift action to be taken against proliferation of the rodent
population. The rodent infestation rate of the territory has decreased gradually
from 16 per cent in 2000 to 4.1 per cent in 2004, indicating that the overall
rodent infestation has improved. However, it should be noted that the rodent
infestation rate varies in different locations. For example, the infestation
rate in Queens Road Central in Central and Western was 8.3 per cent in 2004,
while that in Hollywood Road and the Third Street of the same District was only
0.9 per cent and 1.7 per cent respectively. After obtaining the respective
information, we have already stepped up anti-rodent efforts in those areas with
higher rodent infestation rates.
(b) The anti-rodent efforts of Food and Environmental Hygiene Department (FEHD)
mainly focus on minimising the impact of rodent infestation on public health and
the citizens, and prevention and control of rodent borne diseases. We have not
evaluated the economic losses caused by rodent infestation.
(c) It is not a common practice to assess the number of rodents in a territory
as the assessment is likely to be inaccurate and does not provide a reliable
indicator to the potential rodent impact on public health. In line with accepted
international practice, we make reference to the rodent infestation rate which
measures the percentage of bait consumed by rodents to prevent and control
rodent infestation. Many studies reveal that rodents are highly prolific
animals, hence it is of prime importance that rodent infestation be
expeditiously contained. FEHD makes reference to the surveillance and control
measures as advised by the World Health Organisation and adopted by other
countries to control the rodent problem.
(d) To assess and monitor the rodent infestation in Hong Kong, FEHD takes
reference from the rodent infestation rate, as well as the number of rodents
being captured or poisoned, the number of rodent infestation complaints received
and the inspection results by the pest control staff. Taking into account all
relevant information and after assessing the overall situation, FEHD will
enhance the disinfestations efforts in areas where rodent problems are more
serious, such as certain places in Wan Chai, Yau Ma Tei and Mong Kok.
Ends/Wednesday, February 23, 2005
NNNN